Pakistan ought of Democracy?
In Today's world maximum country has Democracy and many of them follow it. But being a Democratic country Pakistan does not follow the essence of it. It is said to be a Democratic country but facing - House of Problem, Terrorism, Political Instability, Weak Governance which has been a barrier for the development and growth of a country like Pakistan are facing it and creating huge fear and theatre to the International Security especially for India.
In my opinion Democracy defines as where people have their right to rule themselves which creates them the superiority over them for their own benefit. In this form of Government people are assured for a Good quality of life and stable governance in a secure way. Countries like -Pakistan adopts Democracy for to ensure peace, a safe life, for the stability of a government and for the welfare of its Nation. Through Democracy many of the states have a legal equality, political freedom and rule of law. Therefore every individual has a power of choosing their own political leader and remove the leader whose behaviour or instability would mainly remove it but unfortunately it didn't happen in the case of Pakistan and went vice-versa.
In 14th August 1947 Pakistan got its independence from India at that time Liaquat Ali Khan appoints as a Prime Minister of Pakistan. Year get passed at at 1997 Nawaz sharif was appoint as a Prime Minister of Pakistan but General Pervez Musharraf in October 1999 Martial law was imposes in the entire country and the country get imposed in the Military rule. Due to this action the citizen's of Pakistan had gone through thou time and it also faced a huge crisis in Pakistan and created a bolt over Pakistan history. Later Pervez Musharraf imposes a Martial law for 3years and after 3 year at 30 April 2002 again General Pervez Musharraf appoint as a Prime Minister of Republic of Pakistan through 98% face voters. But in 5th June 2013 Nawaz sharif get appoint as a Prime Minister of Republic Of Pakistan and General Pervez Musharraf had get a charge of fraud in the elections. Today's Nawaz sharif in an Prime Minister of Republic Of Pakistan but the rule was mainly given by Chief of Army staff General Raheel Shariff.
In my opinion Chief of Army staff General Raheel Shariff is not the Prime Minister of Republic Of Pakistan but he plays a role like it. If Today's Nawaz sharif wants to be a good relation with India and its Neighbouring country then General Raheel Shariff would interrupt it by creating some manipulation in their relationship like- Pathankort Attack and through Chies Fires and others.
Q1.> what if Nawaz sharif would not retaliate after General Pervez Musharraf appoint?
Ans. The citizen of Pakistan would have seen great political instability which could be barely controlled the economy and the development of Pakistan and it could also lead to a major twist and turns could happen in Pakistan and General Pervez Musharraf career.
Mehul Kumar Mukul
It appears you are concerned with Pakistan's democratic politics trajectory, but it does not come out clearly.
ReplyDelete