JNU's case has been the latest news in this last one week, what happened in JNU has been narrated diversely from onlooker perspective. However, what people narrate and elucidate from their own perspective about the incident should not be believed blindly.
It all started when students attended in a demonstration which was being held on the campus of JNU when kanhaiya Kumar was giving a speech which turned out to be anti-national later on and he was arrested under the sedition charge in Delhi at JNU, there were around 5,000 students who were protesting" in defense of democracy and right to dissent"
Does he really deserve to be arrested?
People have different opinion about him, they explained the incident differently. Some students from the JNU who witnessed the incident say that kanhaiya Kumar said nothing wrong and he has not been such a person who inadvertently do something wrong. What the vice chancellor, amity university, Noida said is "in the last 19 years of my career there has not been a situation where a topic was not allowed to be discussed" as well as shukla said "even debating on controversial like Afzal Guru is not a crime".
However, what I think about this issue by reading the news and his speech is what would be wrong when a person is talking about the truth which has been lost for years and he is called terrorist or anti-national. As he said "violence is not solely to put the gun and kill the innocent people yet violence is also called to those who deny giving your rights". Moreover, making a speech and talking on behalf of thousands of people whose voice have not been heard yet is not a crime, because it's not accompanied by any violence, this serious issue has to be sorted out , he talk nothing wrong but about the rights of those 80% indigent population of the country.
Farheen Manzoor Lone
What is your blog post about?
ReplyDelete